Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02180
Original file (BC 2013 02180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02180
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was informed that within 20 years of his discharge from the 
Air Force - he could change his characterization of service.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides a DD Form 293, 
Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of 
the United States.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 May 1981.

The applicant was tried and convicted by a special court-martial 
for wrongfully soliciting another airman to commit sodomy and 
assaulting another airman with the intent to commit sodomy, both 
in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice 
(UCMJ); and for burglary, in violation of Article 129, UCMJ.  He 
was found guilty and was sentenced to a BCD, confinement for six 
months, and a forfeiture of $200 pay per month for six months, 
and a reduction in grade to airman basic.

On 22 March 1984, the applicant was discharged in the grade of 
airman basic with a BCD under the provisions of Special Court-
Martial Order No. 14.  He served 11 months and 22 days on active 
duty.  His dates of time lost during this period were 7 May 
1982 through 7 October 1982.

________________________________________________________________
_



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial.  JAJM states the applicant alleges 
no injustice and error in the processing of the court-martial 
conviction against him.  At his court-martial - the applicant 
was found guilty of the charges.  The applicant was represented 
by military counsel and was afforded every right he was entitled 
to.

A BCD is designed as punishment for bad conduct.  It also 
indicates that a BCD is more than merely a service 
characterization; it is a punishment for the crimes the 
applicant committed while a member of the armed forces.  The 
applicant’s sentence to a BCD was well within legal limits.  
This discharge characterization was and continues to be part of 
a proper sentence and properly characterizes his service.

The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 October 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Chief, Military Justice Division and adopt 
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02180 in Executive Session on 16 January 2014, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 April 2013, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 16 September 2013.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 October 2013.





2


3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01599

    Original file (BC 2013 01599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01599 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded. The applicant was dishonorably discharged effective 14 December 2009 after serving eight years, seven months, and seven days on active duty. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02460

    Original file (BC 2013 02460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02460 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded. On 15 Dec 86, the applicant was found guilty at a General Court-Martial of attempting to commit sodomy, committing indecent assaults upon two airmen, and for wrongfully having sexual intercourse with one airman....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04408

    Original file (BC 2013 04408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service was terminated by a BCD. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Air Force Office of Special Investigation determined a criminal record does exist. Based on the military justice records in this case and consistent with the decision of the Air Force Court of Military Review, JAJM recommends the Board not grant relief based on any error or injustice with the court- martial process.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01738

    Original file (BC-2011-01738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01738 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. We find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his court- martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05521

    Original file (BC 2013 05521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05521 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be removed. On 10 July 1981, the applicant was tried by special court- martial for: a. one specification of wrongful transfer of marijuana on or about 12 September 1980, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-01459

    Original file (bc-2013-01459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provided copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and General Court-Martial Order The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Rather, in accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552(f), our actions are limited to corrections to the record to reflect actions taken by the reviewing officials and action on the sentence of the court-martial for the purpose of clemency. We find no evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00594

    Original file (BC-2007-00594.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00594 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 SEP 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence on 2 Feb 01. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00132

    Original file (BC-2013-00132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded and his civilian records cleared. He was given military counsel and pled guilty to two uses of cocaine. The applicant’s response, with attachments is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04070

    Original file (BC-2012-04070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04070 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) or an honorable discharge. JAJM states the applicant does not allege an error or injustice, rather he believes the discharge should be upgraded due to the amount of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02511

    Original file (BC-2011-02511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02511 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The applicant was discharged on 7 January 1985 with a BCD and a narrative reason for separation of “Conviction by Court-Martial (Other...